<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 383 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396008</link>
    <description>The court declined to quash the notice challenging the detention of goods under Section 130 of the CGST Act and GGST Act. The applicant was directed to deposit a specified amount towards tax and penalty and provide a bank guarantee for the goods&#039; value to secure their release. Compliance with these conditions would lead to the release of the goods and vehicle, allowing the adjudication process to continue.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 12:59:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615321" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 383 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396008</link>
      <description>The court declined to quash the notice challenging the detention of goods under Section 130 of the CGST Act and GGST Act. The applicant was directed to deposit a specified amount towards tax and penalty and provide a bank guarantee for the goods&#039; value to secure their release. Compliance with these conditions would lead to the release of the goods and vehicle, allowing the adjudication process to continue.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396008</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>