https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396006 The court declined to immediately entertain the petition seeking revision of GST TRAN-1 and allowing Input Tax Credit due to a procedural mistake. Instead, it directed the respondents to respond to the petitioner's communication within four weeks. The court emphasized the importance of addressing procedural issues through competent authorities before resorting to judicial intervention, allowing the petitioner to seek further legal recourse based on the authority's decision. en-us Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396006 The court declined to immediately entertain the petition seeking revision of GST TRAN-1 and allowing Input Tax Credit due to a procedural mistake. Instead, it directed the respondents to respond to the petitioner's communication within four weeks. The court emphasized the importance of addressing procedural issues through competent authorities before resorting to judicial intervention, allowing the petitioner to seek further legal recourse based on the authority's decision. Case-Laws GST Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396006