<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 378 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396003</link>
    <description>Bail was refused in a prosecution alleging fraudulent input tax credit claims under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court treated the alleged absence of any underlying transaction, together with manipulation of fake bill entries and the economic impact of the conduct, as material factors weighing against release on bail. On that basis, the application was rejected.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:15:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615314" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 378 - RAJASTHAN HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396003</link>
      <description>Bail was refused in a prosecution alleging fraudulent input tax credit claims under the Central Goods and Services Tax Act, 2017. The Court treated the alleged absence of any underlying transaction, together with manipulation of fake bill entries and the economic impact of the conduct, as material factors weighing against release on bail. On that basis, the application was rejected.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=396003</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>