<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 372 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395997</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling the reopening of assessment invalid and the addition made by the Assessing Officer unjustified. The Tribunal found that the rental income did not belong to the assessee, leading to the quashing of the notice u/s 148 and deletion of the addition. The decision highlighted the significance of accurate assessment based on factual correctness, ultimately favoring the assessee in the case.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:31:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615304" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 372 - ITAT VISAKHAPATNAM</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395997</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal, ruling the reopening of assessment invalid and the addition made by the Assessing Officer unjustified. The Tribunal found that the rental income did not belong to the assessee, leading to the quashing of the notice u/s 148 and deletion of the addition. The decision highlighted the significance of accurate assessment based on factual correctness, ultimately favoring the assessee in the case.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395997</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>