https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395979 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Hyderabad held that no CENVAT credit was admissible for outward transportation of goods to the buyer's premises when the sale was on a FOR destination basis. This decision aligned with the Supreme Court ruling in a similar case, emphasizing that the place of removal did not shift to the buyer's premises upon sale. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's arguments based on ownership and freight charges, affirming that CENVAT credit on transportation services was not permissible under the law. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the legal precedent set by the Supreme Court. en-us Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:32:04 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395979 The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT, Hyderabad held that no CENVAT credit was admissible for outward transportation of goods to the buyer's premises when the sale was on a FOR destination basis. This decision aligned with the Supreme Court ruling in a similar case, emphasizing that the place of removal did not shift to the buyer's premises upon sale. The Tribunal rejected the appellant's arguments based on ownership and freight charges, affirming that CENVAT credit on transportation services was not permissible under the law. The appeal was dismissed, upholding the legal precedent set by the Supreme Court. Case-Laws Central Excise Fri, 12 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395979