<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 351 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395976</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the Applications under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, declared a moratorium, and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) as proposed by the State Bank of India. The order emphasized that the existence of financial debt and default warranted the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), despite the Corporate Debtor&#039;s assertions of solvency and revival prospects.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2020 10:31:58 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615269" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 351 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CHENNAI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395976</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the Applications under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016, declared a moratorium, and appointed an Interim Resolution Professional (IRP) as proposed by the State Bank of India. The order emphasized that the existence of financial debt and default warranted the initiation of Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process (CIRP), despite the Corporate Debtor&#039;s assertions of solvency and revival prospects.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 05 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395976</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>