<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2019 (11) TMI 1410 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288567</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed with the condonation of a 13-day delay in filing. The rejection of the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was upheld due to the failure to establish default of financial debt. Disputed claims regarding the balance amount and interest owed were countered by the Corporate Debtor, citing obligations under a memorandum of understanding. Allegations of fabricated documents were noted, but default could not be determined without proper documentation. The jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority was clarified, emphasizing the need for criminal courts to address fraud issues. The imposition of costs in the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of with these considerations.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:42:40 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615242" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2019 (11) TMI 1410 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW APPELLATE TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288567</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed with the condonation of a 13-day delay in filing. The rejection of the application under Section 7 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code was upheld due to the failure to establish default of financial debt. Disputed claims regarding the balance amount and interest owed were countered by the Corporate Debtor, citing obligations under a memorandum of understanding. Allegations of fabricated documents were noted, but default could not be determined without proper documentation. The jurisdiction of the Adjudicating Authority was clarified, emphasizing the need for criminal courts to address fraud issues. The imposition of costs in the impugned order was set aside, and the appeal was disposed of with these considerations.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 25 Nov 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288567</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>