<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 344 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395969</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the civil revision petition challenging the NCLT&#039;s order, emphasizing the need for the Tribunal to consider the impact of the Notification setting the minimum default amount. The petitioner was granted the liberty to appeal to the NCLAT or file a review application before the NCLT. The Court underscored the importance of factual examination before deciding abstract legal issues at the higher court level.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2020 02:42:32 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615241" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 344 - MADRAS HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395969</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the civil revision petition challenging the NCLT&#039;s order, emphasizing the need for the Tribunal to consider the impact of the Notification setting the minimum default amount. The petitioner was granted the liberty to appeal to the NCLAT or file a review application before the NCLT. The Court underscored the importance of factual examination before deciding abstract legal issues at the higher court level.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Companies Law</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 13 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395969</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>