<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1998 (12) TMI 637 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288555</link>
    <description>A consignee or blank endorsee under a bill of lading acquires contractual rights of suit when property passes, and a subrogated insurer may sue with the insured consignee. The bill of lading&#039;s shipment recital, together with stamped and typed particulars, was treated as strong evidence of receipt by the carrier, so the defendants had to disprove its contents. Survey material and related documents sufficiently proved shortage and resulting damages. The third defendant, however, was liable only in its capacity as agent, not personally. The dismissal decree was set aside and monetary relief was granted to the appellants.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 15:08:05 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615227" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1998 (12) TMI 637 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288555</link>
      <description>A consignee or blank endorsee under a bill of lading acquires contractual rights of suit when property passes, and a subrogated insurer may sue with the insured consignee. The bill of lading&#039;s shipment recital, together with stamped and typed particulars, was treated as strong evidence of receipt by the carrier, so the defendants had to disprove its contents. Survey material and related documents sufficiently proved shortage and resulting damages. The third defendant, however, was liable only in its capacity as agent, not personally. The dismissal decree was set aside and monetary relief was granted to the appellants.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 23 Dec 1998 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288555</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>