<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 340 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395965</link>
    <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the expenditure on advertisement and sales promotion. The Tribunal emphasized that such expenses were revenue expenditure aimed at enhancing sales through publicity, not creating enduring assets. Previous rulings and legal precedents supported treating these expenses as revenue rather than capital in nature, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 11:46:26 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615213" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 340 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395965</link>
      <description>The Tribunal dismissed the Revenue&#039;s appeal, affirming the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to allow the expenditure on advertisement and sales promotion. The Tribunal emphasized that such expenses were revenue expenditure aimed at enhancing sales through publicity, not creating enduring assets. Previous rulings and legal precedents supported treating these expenses as revenue rather than capital in nature, leading to the dismissal of the Revenue&#039;s appeal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395965</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>