<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2015 (11) TMI 1812 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288542</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of scrap sales in the total turnover for deduction purposes under section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, following a favorable ITAT decision and Supreme Court precedent. It upheld the deletion of expenses related to earlier years based on the assessee&#039;s consistent accounting policy. The disallowance of payment for bonus and leave with wages was upheld due to unverifiable records, while disallowances of foreign travel and general expenses were partially allowed, emphasizing the business nature of the expenses. The judgments highlighted consistency, factual distinctions, and arbitrariness in disallowances.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Aug 2022 16:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615190" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2015 (11) TMI 1812 - ITAT CHANDIGARH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288542</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the inclusion of scrap sales in the total turnover for deduction purposes under section 80HHC of the Income Tax Act, following a favorable ITAT decision and Supreme Court precedent. It upheld the deletion of expenses related to earlier years based on the assessee&#039;s consistent accounting policy. The disallowance of payment for bonus and leave with wages was upheld due to unverifiable records, while disallowances of foreign travel and general expenses were partially allowed, emphasizing the business nature of the expenses. The judgments highlighted consistency, factual distinctions, and arbitrariness in disallowances.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 27 Nov 2015 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288542</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>