<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (1) TMI 1196 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288550</link>
    <description>A writ court will not direct a statutory authority to process a pending application in a particular manner before the authority has taken a decision, especially where no binding Central Government guidelines governed consideration under Rule 144 of the Petroleum Rules, 2002. On that basis, the challenge to non-consideration of the no-objection certificate application was held premature and dismissed. The no-objection certificate issued under an interim order also could not survive independently, because the interim relief was expressly subject to the result of the writ petition. The certificate was therefore set aside and the application remitted to the District Authority for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2020 10:12:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615184" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (1) TMI 1196 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288550</link>
      <description>A writ court will not direct a statutory authority to process a pending application in a particular manner before the authority has taken a decision, especially where no binding Central Government guidelines governed consideration under Rule 144 of the Petroleum Rules, 2002. On that basis, the challenge to non-consideration of the no-objection certificate application was held premature and dismissed. The no-objection certificate issued under an interim order also could not survive independently, because the interim relief was expressly subject to the result of the writ petition. The certificate was therefore set aside and the application remitted to the District Authority for fresh consideration in accordance with law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Tue, 07 Jan 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288550</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>