<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2012 (7) TMI 1111 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288535</link>
    <description>Input tax credit was denied on purchases suppressed from the books of account, because credit is not available on a bill-to-bill basis where the transactions are outside the regular records, even if some invoices show tax collection. The penalty issue was confined to whether the amount should match the actual tax sought to be evaded, and the penalty was reduced to that extent. The findings on suppression and denial of input tax credit were maintained, while the penalty was moderated in favour of the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 15 Jun 2020 10:12:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615120" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2012 (7) TMI 1111 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288535</link>
      <description>Input tax credit was denied on purchases suppressed from the books of account, because credit is not available on a bill-to-bill basis where the transactions are outside the regular records, even if some invoices show tax collection. The penalty issue was confined to whether the amount should match the actual tax sought to be evaded, and the penalty was reduced to that extent. The findings on suppression and denial of input tax credit were maintained, while the penalty was moderated in favour of the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 20 Jul 2012 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288535</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>