<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2018 (6) TMI 1704 - KERALA HIGH COURT  </title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288533</link>
    <description>Special rebate under Section 12 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act remained admissible when tax on suppressed purchases was determined by best judgment assessment under Section 6(2), because the rebate formed part of the net tax computation and was not confined to tax voluntarily paid in the return. The absence of an express statutory bar was treated as significant, and the stricter invoice-based conditions applicable to input tax credit were held inapplicable. The earlier view allowing the rebate was affirmed, the request for reconsideration was declined, and the assessee was held entitled to the rebate on the additions made in assessment.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2020 18:24:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615119" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2018 (6) TMI 1704 - KERALA HIGH COURT  </title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288533</link>
      <description>Special rebate under Section 12 of the Kerala Value Added Tax Act remained admissible when tax on suppressed purchases was determined by best judgment assessment under Section 6(2), because the rebate formed part of the net tax computation and was not confined to tax voluntarily paid in the return. The absence of an express statutory bar was treated as significant, and the stricter invoice-based conditions applicable to input tax credit were held inapplicable. The earlier view allowing the rebate was affirmed, the request for reconsideration was declined, and the assessee was held entitled to the rebate on the additions made in assessment.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>VAT and Sales Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 Jun 2018 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288533</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>