<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 115 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22510</link>
    <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on the first issue, determining the expenditure for the temporary water supply connection as revenue in nature. However, on the second issue regarding the contribution to the Maharashtra Housing Board, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, classifying the expenditure as capital in nature.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 17:13:17 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61509" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 115 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22510</link>
      <description>The court ruled in favor of the assessee on the first issue, determining the expenditure for the temporary water supply connection as revenue in nature. However, on the second issue regarding the contribution to the Maharashtra Housing Board, the court ruled in favor of the Revenue, classifying the expenditure as capital in nature.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 08 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22510</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>