<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 295 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395920</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found the penalty under section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act unsustainable due to the deletion of additions and absence of outstanding tax demand. Referring to Section 221(2) of the Act, the Tribunal canceled the penalty and allowed the appeal of the assessee based on the final order of the CIT(A) and the revised computation of income.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2020 11:19:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615080" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 295 - ITAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395920</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found the penalty under section 221(1) of the Income Tax Act unsustainable due to the deletion of additions and absence of outstanding tax demand. Referring to Section 221(2) of the Act, the Tribunal canceled the penalty and allowed the appeal of the assessee based on the final order of the CIT(A) and the revised computation of income.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395920</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>