<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 281 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395906</link>
    <description>The Tribunal admitted the application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiation. It appointed an Interim Resolution Professional, imposed a moratorium, and directed the Operational Creditor to deposit a specified sum. The decision was based on the establishment of default in payment by the Corporate Debtor and the rejection of the dispute raised as lacking merit.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 13 Jun 2020 10:49:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615062" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 281 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395906</link>
      <description>The Tribunal admitted the application under section 9 of the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 for Corporate Insolvency Resolution Process initiation. It appointed an Interim Resolution Professional, imposed a moratorium, and directed the Operational Creditor to deposit a specified sum. The decision was based on the establishment of default in payment by the Corporate Debtor and the rejection of the dispute raised as lacking merit.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395906</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>