<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 271 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395896</link>
    <description>The court accepted the respondent&#039;s assurance that no coercive action would be taken until the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-6 decided on the stay application. The court directed the Principal Commissioner to make a decision within two months and ordered the immediate uploading of the order on the website, with a copy sent to the petitioner&#039;s counsel via email.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 11:53:19 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=615015" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 271 - DELHI HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395896</link>
      <description>The court accepted the respondent&#039;s assurance that no coercive action would be taken until the Principal Commissioner of Income Tax-6 decided on the stay application. The court directed the Principal Commissioner to make a decision within two months and ordered the immediate uploading of the order on the website, with a copy sent to the petitioner&#039;s counsel via email.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395896</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>