<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 259 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395884</link>
    <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order. The High Court of Madras held that the brokerage received by the appellant in Indian Rupees should be treated as receipts for export in foreign currency, exempting it from service tax. The decision aligned with the interpretation of RBI circular and Service Tax Act provisions, stating that receiving payment in convertible foreign exchange is not a condition for considering it as export of service.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 21:05:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614991" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 259 - CESTAT HYDERABAD</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395884</link>
      <description>The appeal was allowed, setting aside the impugned order. The High Court of Madras held that the brokerage received by the appellant in Indian Rupees should be treated as receipts for export in foreign currency, exempting it from service tax. The decision aligned with the interpretation of RBI circular and Service Tax Act provisions, stating that receiving payment in convertible foreign exchange is not a condition for considering it as export of service.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395884</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>