<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 254 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395879</link>
    <description>The Tribunal found no procedural lapse in the liquidation process, determining that the Liquidator adhered to the regulations under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The reserve prices were based on valuations by registered valuers, and notices served to the Corporate Debtor were deemed adequate. Despite allegations of assets being sold below actual prices, the Tribunal dismissed the application, ruling it not maintainable.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:44:10 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614982" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 254 - NATIONAL COMPANY LAW TRIBUNAL, CUTTACK BENCH</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395879</link>
      <description>The Tribunal found no procedural lapse in the liquidation process, determining that the Liquidator adhered to the regulations under the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. The reserve prices were based on valuations by registered valuers, and notices served to the Corporate Debtor were deemed adequate. Despite allegations of assets being sold below actual prices, the Tribunal dismissed the application, ruling it not maintainable.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Insolvency and Bankruptcy</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 21 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395879</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>