<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 252 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395877</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for a fresh determination of the interest payable by the appellant, emphasizing the importance of correct interest calculation and adherence to principles of natural justice in the process. The Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner (Appeals) that the interest calculation was flawed and directed detailed quantification of the appellant&#039;s interest liability.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:44:04 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614980" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 252 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395877</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal remanded the case back to the adjudicating authority for a fresh determination of the interest payable by the appellant, emphasizing the importance of correct interest calculation and adherence to principles of natural justice in the process. The Tribunal agreed with the Commissioner (Appeals) that the interest calculation was flawed and directed detailed quantification of the appellant&#039;s interest liability.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 20 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395877</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>