<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 251 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395876</link>
    <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order for recovery of alleged short payment of Service Tax. It held that the appellant, a Goods Transport Agency service recipient, was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 13/2008 without the need for a declaration about Cenvat credit. The Tribunal emphasized the unconditional exemption for 75% of the freight amount and criticized the lower authorities for not considering the updated laws and amendments, leading to an erroneous finding against the appellant.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:44:01 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614979" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 251 - CESTAT NEW DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395876</link>
      <description>The Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, setting aside the order for recovery of alleged short payment of Service Tax. It held that the appellant, a Goods Transport Agency service recipient, was entitled to exemption under Notification No. 13/2008 without the need for a declaration about Cenvat credit. The Tribunal emphasized the unconditional exemption for 75% of the freight amount and criticized the lower authorities for not considering the updated laws and amendments, leading to an erroneous finding against the appellant.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 30 Oct 2019 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395876</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>