https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288512 The Township Court of Myinmu had territorial jurisdiction because part of the cause of action arose there within section 20(c) of the Civil Procedure Code. In a suit by a principal against commission agents for alleged negligence, misconduct and breach of instructions, the place of performance and payment was material. The evidence showed that accounts were sent to Myinmu and money due to the plaintiff was sent there, and the contract carried an implied obligation that payment be made at the plaintiff's residence. Section 49 of the Contract Act did not displace the ordinary rule that a debtor must seek out the creditor to pay. The jurisdictional objection therefore failed. en-us Thu, 19 Dec 1935 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Jun 2020 10:16:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288512 The Township Court of Myinmu had territorial jurisdiction because part of the cause of action arose there within section 20(c) of the Civil Procedure Code. In a suit by a principal against commission agents for alleged negligence, misconduct and breach of instructions, the place of performance and payment was material. The evidence showed that accounts were sent to Myinmu and money due to the plaintiff was sent there, and the contract carried an implied obligation that payment be made at the plaintiff's residence. Section 49 of the Contract Act did not displace the ordinary rule that a debtor must seek out the creditor to pay. The jurisdictional objection therefore failed. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 19 Dec 1935 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288512