https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288508 Territorial jurisdiction in a contract refund suit may lie where the contract was made or where performance was intended to occur, because cause of action can arise wholly or in part at either place under Section 20 CPC. Where no place of performance is fixed, performance may be referable to the creditor's place under Section 49 of the Contract Act. On those principles, the District Munsif's Court at Tiruvarur was treated as competent to try the suit for refund of the advance, and the plaintiff's entitlement to recover the advance with interest followed from the finding that delivery of goods had been rightly refused as contrary to instructions. en-us Wed, 14 Mar 1934 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 12 Jun 2020 09:51:48 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288508 Territorial jurisdiction in a contract refund suit may lie where the contract was made or where performance was intended to occur, because cause of action can arise wholly or in part at either place under Section 20 CPC. Where no place of performance is fixed, performance may be referable to the creditor's place under Section 49 of the Contract Act. On those principles, the District Munsif's Court at Tiruvarur was treated as competent to try the suit for refund of the advance, and the plaintiff's entitlement to recover the advance with interest followed from the finding that delivery of goods had been rightly refused as contrary to instructions. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 14 Mar 1934 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288508