<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 238 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395863</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing a fresh assessment by the Assessing Officer based on new contentions and evidence presented during the Tribunal proceedings. The case was remanded for reassessment, emphasizing the need for verification of the appellant&#039;s claim that the amount in question constituted management fees for Vodafone, rather than commission income subject to tax deduction at source under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:02:27 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614925" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 238 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395863</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the appeal for statistical purposes, directing a fresh assessment by the Assessing Officer based on new contentions and evidence presented during the Tribunal proceedings. The case was remanded for reassessment, emphasizing the need for verification of the appellant&#039;s claim that the amount in question constituted management fees for Vodafone, rather than commission income subject to tax deduction at source under section 40(a)(ia) of the Income Tax Act, 1961.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 04 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395863</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>