<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 237 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395862</link>
    <description>The Tribunal directed the exclusion of specific companies from the comparables list due to functional dissimilarities and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to exclude telecommunication and foreign currency expenses from total turnover for Section 10A deduction. It mandated a 15% RPT filter and instructed the AO/TPO to compute risk adjustments and working capital adjustments accurately. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed order considering all submissions, ensuring proper opportunities for the assessee.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 11:01:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614924" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 237 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395862</link>
      <description>The Tribunal directed the exclusion of specific companies from the comparables list due to functional dissimilarities and upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decision to exclude telecommunication and foreign currency expenses from total turnover for Section 10A deduction. It mandated a 15% RPT filter and instructed the AO/TPO to compute risk adjustments and working capital adjustments accurately. The Tribunal emphasized the need for a detailed order considering all submissions, ensuring proper opportunities for the assessee.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 27 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395862</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>