<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 234 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395859</link>
    <description>The High Court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s writ petition challenging the rejection of their licence renewal application by customs authorities. The court held that the petitioner should pursue the appeal remedy available under Regulation 19 and Section 129 of the Customs Act within 90 days, rather than seeking relief through extraordinary jurisdiction. Emphasizing the importance of following the prescribed legal process, the court directed the petitioner to avail the appeal remedy and highlighted the need for timely resolution through the tribunal. The writ petition was ultimately disposed of, underscoring the significance of utilizing proper legal channels for redressal.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Jun 2020 10:02:13 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614921" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 234 - KERALA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395859</link>
      <description>The High Court dismissed the petitioner&#039;s writ petition challenging the rejection of their licence renewal application by customs authorities. The court held that the petitioner should pursue the appeal remedy available under Regulation 19 and Section 129 of the Customs Act within 90 days, rather than seeking relief through extraordinary jurisdiction. Emphasizing the importance of following the prescribed legal process, the court directed the petitioner to avail the appeal remedy and highlighted the need for timely resolution through the tribunal. The writ petition was ultimately disposed of, underscoring the significance of utilizing proper legal channels for redressal.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395859</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>