https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395850 The appellant's appeal against the dismissal of a refund claim as time-barred was successful. The court found that the appellant was not required to file a new claim after the favorable decision on the initial claim in 2016. The authorities' rejection of the 2017 claim as time-barred was deemed incorrect, as they should have acted promptly following the Commissioner's order. The impugned order was set aside, directing the authorities to comply with the Commissioner's order within 15 days. The issue of interest due to the delay was to be addressed separately. en-us Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Mon, 31 May 2021 13:08:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395850 The appellant's appeal against the dismissal of a refund claim as time-barred was successful. The court found that the appellant was not required to file a new claim after the favorable decision on the initial claim in 2016. The authorities' rejection of the 2017 claim as time-barred was deemed incorrect, as they should have acted promptly following the Commissioner's order. The impugned order was set aside, directing the authorities to comply with the Commissioner's order within 15 days. The issue of interest due to the delay was to be addressed separately. Case-Laws Service Tax Thu, 06 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395850