https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288492 The Court examined constitutional challenges to regulatory provisions on dance performances and upheld the definition of "obscene dance" as sufficiently definite, while striking down provisions that were arbitrary, vague, discriminatory in effect, excessive, or privacy-invading. It invalidated the ban on dual licensing, vague fitness criteria such as "good character" and "antecedents," and several venue conditions that were irrational or unworkable, including the partition, distance, salary, alcohol, and CCTV requirements. The anti-indecency ban on showering coins or notes on the stage and the time restriction on performances were upheld. The scheme was therefore sustained only to the extent that it imposed workable and proportionate regulatory controls. en-us Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 10 Jul 2025 17:14:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288492 The Court examined constitutional challenges to regulatory provisions on dance performances and upheld the definition of "obscene dance" as sufficiently definite, while striking down provisions that were arbitrary, vague, discriminatory in effect, excessive, or privacy-invading. It invalidated the ban on dual licensing, vague fitness criteria such as "good character" and "antecedents," and several venue conditions that were irrational or unworkable, including the partition, distance, salary, alcohol, and CCTV requirements. The anti-indecency ban on showering coins or notes on the stage and the time restriction on performances were upheld. The scheme was therefore sustained only to the extent that it imposed workable and proportionate regulatory controls. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 17 Jan 2019 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288492