https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288485 The court dismissed the appellant's suit seeking dissolution of the partnership of the firm Ganga Ram-Gokal Chand, ruling that the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence of his partnership in the business. It was clarified that the appellant and defendants were partners in saltpeter works, with the Gujranwala undertaking being a branch of the Chhapanwali business. The court granted a decree for dissolution of the Chhapanwali partnership, with accounts of the Gujranwala concern to be settled accordingly. The appellant's claims of partnership were refuted, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with costs awarded against the appellant. en-us Wed, 16 Dec 1925 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jun 2020 17:25:20 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288485 The court dismissed the appellant's suit seeking dissolution of the partnership of the firm Ganga Ram-Gokal Chand, ruling that the appellant failed to provide sufficient evidence of his partnership in the business. It was clarified that the appellant and defendants were partners in saltpeter works, with the Gujranwala undertaking being a branch of the Chhapanwali business. The court granted a decree for dissolution of the Chhapanwali partnership, with accounts of the Gujranwala concern to be settled accordingly. The appellant's claims of partnership were refuted, leading to the dismissal of the appeal with costs awarded against the appellant. Case-Laws Service Tax Wed, 16 Dec 1925 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288485