<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1989 (3) TMI 399 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288479</link>
    <description>Writ jurisdiction will not reappraise a customs authority&#039;s factual finding on export under-invoicing where the conclusion is supported by material and discloses no jurisdictional error, perversity, breach of natural justice, or apparent error of law. Under the amended foreign exchange regime, a declaration of export value must be true in all material particulars; where the declared value is untrue, the statutory prohibition is attracted and the Customs Act consequences follow through the deeming provision. A plea of bona fide does not displace liability once the declaration is found materially false. The challenge to the adjudication order therefore failed.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 11:55:03 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614865" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1989 (3) TMI 399 - CALCUTTA HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288479</link>
      <description>Writ jurisdiction will not reappraise a customs authority&#039;s factual finding on export under-invoicing where the conclusion is supported by material and discloses no jurisdictional error, perversity, breach of natural justice, or apparent error of law. Under the amended foreign exchange regime, a declaration of export value must be true in all material particulars; where the declared value is untrue, the statutory prohibition is attracted and the Customs Act consequences follow through the deeming provision. A plea of bona fide does not displace liability once the declaration is found materially false. The challenge to the adjudication order therefore failed.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Customs</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 08 Mar 1989 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288479</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>