<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 215 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395840</link>
    <description>The court disposed of the petition, allowing the petitioner to avail the remedy of filing an appeal before the Tribunal as per the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax (Ninth Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2019. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to the seizure orders was recognized, and the appeal period was extended until the formation of the appellate tribunal, ensuring no prejudice to the petitioner as the seized goods had been released.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 18 Mar 2025 13:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614852" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 215 - ALLAHABAD HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395840</link>
      <description>The court disposed of the petition, allowing the petitioner to avail the remedy of filing an appeal before the Tribunal as per the provisions of the Central Goods and Services Tax (Ninth Removal of Difficulties) Order, 2019. The petitioner&#039;s challenge to the seizure orders was recognized, and the appeal period was extended until the formation of the appellate tribunal, ensuring no prejudice to the petitioner as the seized goods had been released.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395840</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>