<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 208 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395833</link>
    <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, restricting the addition to the peak credit amount of Rs. 13,06,500 for the assessment year 2015-16. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of substantiated claims and distinguished cases to accurately determine undisclosed income, recognizing legitimate business transactions and the application of the peak credit theory to prevent double taxation in cases of regular deposits and withdrawals.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:55:20 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614842" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 208 - ITAT CUTTACK</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395833</link>
      <description>The Tribunal partially allowed the appeal, restricting the addition to the peak credit amount of Rs. 13,06,500 for the assessment year 2015-16. The Tribunal emphasized the significance of substantiated claims and distinguished cases to accurately determine undisclosed income, recognizing legitimate business transactions and the application of the peak credit theory to prevent double taxation in cases of regular deposits and withdrawals.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395833</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>