<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 203 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395828</link>
    <description>The ITAT Bangalore addressed the invocation of section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act for taxing share premium and the taxation of share capital under section 68 without a specific hearing opportunity. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal directed a fresh decision by the assessing officer in both cases. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the significance of adhering to legal procedures and ensuring fair hearings in tax assessments.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 22:03:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614835" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 203 - ITAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395828</link>
      <description>The ITAT Bangalore addressed the invocation of section 56(2)(viib) of the Income Tax Act for taxing share premium and the taxation of share capital under section 68 without a specific hearing opportunity. Relying on legal precedents, the Tribunal directed a fresh decision by the assessing officer in both cases. The appeal was partly allowed for statistical purposes, emphasizing the significance of adhering to legal procedures and ensuring fair hearings in tax assessments.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395828</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>