https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288476 Under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, an acquisition notification is valid if it shows acquisition for development by the Board or for a purpose furthering the Act's industrial objects; it need not set out the detailed downstream project of a private lessee, absent demonstrated prejudice. A gap between the preliminary notification and declaration does not by itself invalidate the acquisition because the Act does not impose the Land Acquisition Act's time limit. Allegations of mala fides and discriminatory de-notification failed for want of factual foundation. The acquisition was upheld. en-us Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 10 Jun 2020 09:30:15 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288476 Under the Karnataka Industrial Areas Development Act, an acquisition notification is valid if it shows acquisition for development by the Board or for a purpose furthering the Act's industrial objects; it need not set out the detailed downstream project of a private lessee, absent demonstrated prejudice. A gap between the preliminary notification and declaration does not by itself invalidate the acquisition because the Act does not impose the Land Acquisition Act's time limit. Allegations of mala fides and discriminatory de-notification failed for want of factual foundation. The acquisition was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 18 Aug 2006 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288476