<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2009 (3) TMI 1084 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288469</link>
    <description>A transferee pendente lite with a substantial and direct interest in a pending suit for cancellation of a sale deed may be impleaded as plaintiff No. 2 in the court&#039;s discretion. Prima facie satisfaction is sufficient at the impleadment stage; no detailed inquiry is required. The original plaintiff&#039;s withdrawal from the litigation does not bar a transferee who remains interested in the outcome from continuing the suit. Technical objections relating to court fees, amendment, limitation, or alleged collusion do not defeat impleadment where the transferee&#039;s interest is directly affected. The refusal to implead was set aside and joinder was permitted.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Tue, 09 Jun 2020 13:25:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614798" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2009 (3) TMI 1084 - GUJARAT HIGH COURT</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288469</link>
      <description>A transferee pendente lite with a substantial and direct interest in a pending suit for cancellation of a sale deed may be impleaded as plaintiff No. 2 in the court&#039;s discretion. Prima facie satisfaction is sufficient at the impleadment stage; no detailed inquiry is required. The original plaintiff&#039;s withdrawal from the litigation does not bar a transferee who remains interested in the outcome from continuing the suit. Technical objections relating to court fees, amendment, limitation, or alleged collusion do not defeat impleadment where the transferee&#039;s interest is directly affected. The refusal to implead was set aside and joinder was permitted.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Indian Laws</law>
      <pubDate>Thu, 26 Mar 2009 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288469</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>