<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (5) TMI 50 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22480</link>
    <description>A person can be treated as an affected person under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 only where the convicted relative&#039;s offence satisfies the statutory threshold in section 2(1) read with section 2(2)(a)(i), namely conviction for an offence in relation to goods of a value exceeding one lakh rupees. Where the record contains no finding that this condition is met, the Competent Authority cannot assume the appellant falls within the Act. The burden to establish the statutory foundation for forfeiture proceedings rests on the authority, and without that finding the initiation of proceedings lacks jurisdiction.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 13:15:11 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61479" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (5) TMI 50 - KARNATAKA High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22480</link>
      <description>A person can be treated as an affected person under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976 only where the convicted relative&#039;s offence satisfies the statutory threshold in section 2(1) read with section 2(2)(a)(i), namely conviction for an offence in relation to goods of a value exceeding one lakh rupees. Where the record contains no finding that this condition is met, the Competent Authority cannot assume the appellant falls within the Act. The burden to establish the statutory foundation for forfeiture proceedings rests on the authority, and without that finding the initiation of proceedings lacks jurisdiction.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 29 May 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22480</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>