<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2017 (5) TMI 1731 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288455</link>
    <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The settlement compensation for closed units was allowed under Section 37(1) as it was not part of the VRS scheme. Additionally, the advances written off were considered trading losses connected to the business and deductible under Section 37. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 03/05/2017.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 18:14:08 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614754" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2017 (5) TMI 1731 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288455</link>
      <description>The Tribunal upheld the CIT(A)&#039;s decisions, dismissing the Revenue&#039;s appeal. The settlement compensation for closed units was allowed under Section 37(1) as it was not part of the VRS scheme. Additionally, the advances written off were considered trading losses connected to the business and deductible under Section 37. The Tribunal&#039;s decision was pronounced on 03/05/2017.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 03 May 2017 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288455</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>