<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>A REVERSE GOOGLY- ALLOWABILITY OF TRAN 1 CREDIT ADMIST RETROSPECTIVE AMENDMENT IN SECTION 140 OF CGST ACT, 2017 VIS A VIS VARIOUS JUDGEMENTS PRONOUNCED.</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9247</link>
    <description>The note analyses conflict between judicial rulings treating accumulated CENVAT/ITC as a vested property interest and Rule 117 time limits for filing TRAN-1 under Section 140, and the Finance Act, 2020 retrospective insertion of &quot;within such time and&quot; into Section 140 to validate rule-prescribed time bars. It highlights broad judicial definitions of &quot;technical difficulty&quot; that permitted extensions and manual filings, surveys constitutional limits on retrospective amendments, and sets out implications for taxpayers to preserve claims and pursue remedies given the amendment&#039;s potential to negate earlier favorable orders.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 11:15:46 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 11 Feb 2026 15:58:57 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614697" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>A REVERSE GOOGLY- ALLOWABILITY OF TRAN 1 CREDIT ADMIST RETROSPECTIVE AMENDMENT IN SECTION 140 OF CGST ACT, 2017 VIS A VIS VARIOUS JUDGEMENTS PRONOUNCED.</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9247</link>
      <description>The note analyses conflict between judicial rulings treating accumulated CENVAT/ITC as a vested property interest and Rule 117 time limits for filing TRAN-1 under Section 140, and the Finance Act, 2020 retrospective insertion of &quot;within such time and&quot; into Section 140 to validate rule-prescribed time bars. It highlights broad judicial definitions of &quot;technical difficulty&quot; that permitted extensions and manual filings, surveys constitutional limits on retrospective amendments, and sets out implications for taxpayers to preserve claims and pursue remedies given the amendment&#039;s potential to negate earlier favorable orders.</description>
      <category>Articles</category>
      <law>Goods and Services Tax - GST</law>
      <pubDate>Mon, 08 Jun 2020 11:15:46 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/article/detailed?id=9247</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>