<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>1991 (3) TMI 106 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22465</link>
    <description>The High Court held that the assessee was entitled to a deduction under section 80J of the Income-tax Act for the manufacture of axle shafts, torsion bars, and coil springs. The Court determined that a new industrial undertaking had been established, making the assessee eligible for the deduction despite the common use of premises and staff. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under section 80J without any order as to costs.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 10 Dec 2009 12:28:12 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=61464" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>1991 (3) TMI 106 - BOMBAY High Court</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22465</link>
      <description>The High Court held that the assessee was entitled to a deduction under section 80J of the Income-tax Act for the manufacture of axle shafts, torsion bars, and coil springs. The Court determined that a new industrial undertaking had been established, making the assessee eligible for the deduction despite the common use of premises and staff. The Court ruled in favor of the assessee, allowing the deduction under section 80J without any order as to costs.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 06 Mar 1991 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=22465</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>