<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 151 - ITAT DELHI</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395776</link>
    <description>The appeal was against the CIT(A)&#039;s order for A.Y 2012-13, involving the addition of amounts from the appellant&#039;s financial records. Despite opportunities to reconcile discrepancies, the appellant failed to provide adequate evidence. The CIT(A) upheld sustained disallowances due to the appellant&#039;s failure to discharge the onus of proof. The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, finding no errors, leading to the dismissal of the appeal on 04.03.2020.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2020 11:42:18 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614639" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 151 - ITAT DELHI</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395776</link>
      <description>The appeal was against the CIT(A)&#039;s order for A.Y 2012-13, involving the addition of amounts from the appellant&#039;s financial records. Despite opportunities to reconcile discrepancies, the appellant failed to provide adequate evidence. The CIT(A) upheld sustained disallowances due to the appellant&#039;s failure to discharge the onus of proof. The ITAT affirmed the CIT(A)&#039;s decision, finding no errors, leading to the dismissal of the appeal on 04.03.2020.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 04 Mar 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395776</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>