https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395765 The Court held that the Public Notice issued by DGFT, which disallowed certain export items, was beyond DGFT's authority to amend the Foreign Trade Policy. The retrospective application of the Public Notice was rejected, and processing delays in the Petitioner's applications were deemed unjustified. The Court ruled that the applications should be processed based on the policy provisions at the time of filing, leading to the quashing of the Public Notice and directing the processing of the applications accordingly. en-us Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Wed, 11 Nov 2020 14:58:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395765 The Court held that the Public Notice issued by DGFT, which disallowed certain export items, was beyond DGFT's authority to amend the Foreign Trade Policy. The retrospective application of the Public Notice was rejected, and processing delays in the Petitioner's applications were deemed unjustified. The Court ruled that the applications should be processed based on the policy provisions at the time of filing, leading to the quashing of the Public Notice and directing the processing of the applications accordingly. Case-Laws Customs Tue, 11 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395765