https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395764 The court dismissed the petitioner's prayer for default bail under Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court found that the complaint filed by the Narcotics Control Bureau was within the statutory period and that the Special Judge had taken cognizance of the offenses. As the order of cognizance was unchallenged, the court concluded that the petitioner's argument regarding the pending investigation in the complaint was not valid. The court cited precedents to support its decision that the right to default bail ceases once a charge sheet is filed, ultimately denying the petitioner's request for bail. en-us Thu, 28 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Sat, 06 Jun 2020 10:48:42 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395764 The court dismissed the petitioner's prayer for default bail under Section 167(2) of the Criminal Procedure Code. The court found that the complaint filed by the Narcotics Control Bureau was within the statutory period and that the Special Judge had taken cognizance of the offenses. As the order of cognizance was unchallenged, the court concluded that the petitioner's argument regarding the pending investigation in the complaint was not valid. The court cited precedents to support its decision that the right to default bail ceases once a charge sheet is filed, ultimately denying the petitioner's request for bail. Case-Laws Indian Laws Thu, 28 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395764