https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288419 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision in two appeals arising from an election petition challenging a candidate's victory due to corrupt practices under Section 123 of the Representation of People Act, 1951. The appellant was found guilty of corrupt practices for discrepancies in the election expenditure return, specifically regarding the use of multiple vehicles, leading to the setting aside of the election result. The Court emphasized the need for concrete evidence and upheld the burden of proof on the respondent, ultimately dismissing the appeal and affirming the corrupt practice finding. en-us Tue, 26 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jun 2020 16:17:54 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288419 The Supreme Court upheld the High Court's decision in two appeals arising from an election petition challenging a candidate's victory due to corrupt practices under Section 123 of the Representation of People Act, 1951. The appellant was found guilty of corrupt practices for discrepancies in the election expenditure return, specifically regarding the use of multiple vehicles, leading to the setting aside of the election result. The Court emphasized the need for concrete evidence and upheld the burden of proof on the respondent, ultimately dismissing the appeal and affirming the corrupt practice finding. Case-Laws Income Tax Tue, 26 Mar 1996 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288419