<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 133 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395758</link>
    <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ordering the deletion of the Rs. 16 crore addition under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee effectively demonstrated the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the share applicants. The AO failed to disprove the evidence provided, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision relied on judicial precedents emphasizing the onus of proof and the need for thorough inquiries by the AO.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Wed, 06 Nov 2024 11:40:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614487" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 133 - ITAT KOLKATA</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395758</link>
      <description>The Tribunal allowed the assessee&#039;s appeal, ordering the deletion of the Rs. 16 crore addition under Section 68 of the Income-tax Act, 1961. The assessee effectively demonstrated the identity, creditworthiness, and genuineness of the share applicants. The AO failed to disprove the evidence provided, and the Tribunal&#039;s decision relied on judicial precedents emphasizing the onus of proof and the need for thorough inquiries by the AO.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Income Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 29 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395758</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>