https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288414 The High Court affirmed that the letter dated 18-12-1984 by the Forest Settlement Officer constituted an "order" under the Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, allowing the District Judge to entertain the appeal. The Court held that the letter's determination of the claims fulfilled the adjudication process, despite pending final approval from the Government of India. The Divisional Forest Officer's challenge was dismissed as the claims were properly adjudicated by the Forest Settlement Officer, resulting in the dismissal of the writ petition. en-us Fri, 25 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 Fri, 05 Jun 2020 11:23:18 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288414 The High Court affirmed that the letter dated 18-12-1984 by the Forest Settlement Officer constituted an "order" under the Andhra Pradesh Forest Act, allowing the District Judge to entertain the appeal. The Court held that the letter's determination of the claims fulfilled the adjudication process, despite pending final approval from the Government of India. The Divisional Forest Officer's challenge was dismissed as the claims were properly adjudicated by the Forest Settlement Officer, resulting in the dismissal of the writ petition. Case-Laws Indian Laws Fri, 25 Jan 2002 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288414