<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 122 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395747</link>
    <description>The Tribunal held that the services provided by the appellant to the Road Transport Authorities were not classified as &#039;Business Auxiliary Services&#039; but rather as assistance in statutory functions. Relying on judicial decisions and a CBEC circular exempting activities by sovereign/public authorities under statutory obligations from service tax, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting consequential relief accordingly.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Thu, 18 Feb 2021 16:14:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614454" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 122 - CESTAT BANGALORE</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395747</link>
      <description>The Tribunal held that the services provided by the appellant to the Road Transport Authorities were not classified as &#039;Business Auxiliary Services&#039; but rather as assistance in statutory functions. Relying on judicial decisions and a CBEC circular exempting activities by sovereign/public authorities under statutory obligations from service tax, the Tribunal ruled in favor of the appellant, granting consequential relief accordingly.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Service Tax</law>
      <pubDate>Wed, 26 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395747</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>