<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<?xml-stylesheet type="text/xsl" href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_sitemap/rss_feed_blog.xsl?v=1750492856"?>
<rss version="2.0" xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom">
  <channel>
    <title>2020 (6) TMI 120 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
    <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395745</link>
    <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the compensation paid for non-lifting of steam was a valid input service eligible for Cenvat Credit. The Tribunal found that the appellant had not passed on the refund amount to any other party, satisfying the unjust enrichment criteria. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the previous decision and granting relief to the appellant as per the law.</description>
    <language>en-us</language>
    <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
    <lastBuildDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2020 09:48:00 +0530</lastBuildDate>
    <generator>TaxTMI RSS Generator</generator>
    <atom:link href="https://www.taxtmi.com/rss_feed_blog?id=614450" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml"/>
    <item>
      <title>2020 (6) TMI 120 - CESTAT Ahmedabad</title>
      <link>https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395745</link>
      <description>The Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Ahmedabad ruled in favor of the appellant, holding that the compensation paid for non-lifting of steam was a valid input service eligible for Cenvat Credit. The Tribunal found that the appellant had not passed on the refund amount to any other party, satisfying the unjust enrichment criteria. Consequently, the Tribunal allowed the appeal, overturning the previous decision and granting relief to the appellant as per the law.</description>
      <category>Case-Laws</category>
      <law>Central Excise</law>
      <pubDate>Fri, 28 Feb 2020 00:00:00 +0530</pubDate>
      <guid isPermaLink="true">https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395745</guid>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>