https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288400 Liability under section 34 of the Indian Penal Code is assessed on the evidence led against the accused in the particular case, and an acquittal of a co-participant in a separate trial does not bind the later court or prevent it from examining common intention. The earlier acquittal therefore did not bar conviction of the appellant for murder and attempted murder on the evidence in his own case. The principle against conflicting findings was held inapplicable because the proceedings involved different accused and different evidentiary records, and the conviction under sections 302 and 307 read with section 34 was upheld. en-us Wed, 04 Nov 1964 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jun 2020 15:37:27 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288400 Liability under section 34 of the Indian Penal Code is assessed on the evidence led against the accused in the particular case, and an acquittal of a co-participant in a separate trial does not bind the later court or prevent it from examining common intention. The earlier acquittal therefore did not bar conviction of the appellant for murder and attempted murder on the evidence in his own case. The principle against conflicting findings was held inapplicable because the proceedings involved different accused and different evidentiary records, and the conviction under sections 302 and 307 read with section 34 was upheld. Case-Laws Indian Laws Wed, 04 Nov 1964 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=288400