https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395731 Public interest litigation requires the petitioner to show bona fide credentials, trustworthy material, and a real public cause before Article 226 jurisdiction is invoked. The Court found those conditions absent because the petitioner was not a retired government servant and had not established a genuine public interest, so the PIL was not maintainable. The Court also examined the 28.06.2012 amendment allowing retired employees to continue provident fund accounts under the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951, and found no legal infirmity in the State's rule-making power or inconsistency with the governing service framework. As a result, no writ relief was granted. en-us Sat, 30 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 Thu, 04 Jun 2020 05:09:00 +0530 TaxTMI RSS Generator https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395731 Public interest litigation requires the petitioner to show bona fide credentials, trustworthy material, and a real public cause before Article 226 jurisdiction is invoked. The Court found those conditions absent because the petitioner was not a retired government servant and had not established a genuine public interest, so the PIL was not maintainable. The Court also examined the 28.06.2012 amendment allowing retired employees to continue provident fund accounts under the Rajasthan Service Rules, 1951, and found no legal infirmity in the State's rule-making power or inconsistency with the governing service framework. As a result, no writ relief was granted. Case-Laws Income Tax Sat, 30 May 2020 00:00:00 +0530 https://www.taxtmi.com/caselaws?id=395731